Selected subtotal: $21.11. Standard US shipping is $9.99 below $15, $7.99 from $15 to below $49, and free at $49 after discounts. Freight items excluded; other rates are shown at checkout.
IN STOCK
✓SAME-DAY DISPATCH — ELIGIBLE IN-STOCK ORDERS BY 2 PM ET
✓STANDARD US SHIPPING — $9.99 BELOW $15 · $7.99 FROM $15 · FREE AT $49 AFTER DISCOUNTS
✓LOCAL PICKUP — FALL RIVER
✓NET-30 & PO — APPROVED ACCOUNTS
4IN CAGE FRAME
Documented Richard specifications
official product or family name
4IN CAGE FRAME
PRODUCT FIT · IS THIS THE RIGHT TOOL?Straight answers. If it's the wrong tool for your job, we'll say so.
The guidance below describes applications and limitations. For a match to your particular job or an existing tool, ask us to confirm fit.
The Richard 92010 is, per its official source, a 4-inch roller cage frame with a 10-inch-long plastic handle — arichardcanada.com's accepted claim reads "4IN CAGE FRAME," and the official French description gives the handle: "armature avec manche en plastique de 10 po long."
The store title says something else: "Richard 92010 10\" Frame." Read the way every roller buyer reads a leading number, that promises a ten-inch-wide roller frame — a size that would sit between the 9" tier and the 18" 47420.
The ten inches in this listing's life is the handle's length; the frame is four inches wide, and the official JSON-LD is the proof.
The same failure pattern hits the 92011 one listing over (its "16\" frame" title is a 16" handle on the same 4" frame).
Both are flagged for retitle before publish per the line register — a buyer who orders a "10-inch frame" and unboxes a 4" mini is a return, a review, and a support thread, all self-inflicted by a title.
At the 92005's guide — cabinets and bookcases, doors, cover matching, technique. Every answer there is written for exactly this documented hardware.
Which covers fit?
No documented roster — cover maker's frame statement plus the hand test (92005 §2c).
Is this frame ten inches wide?
No — four inches wide, with a ten-inch handle. The title reads as a width and isn't one; the official Richard source is explicit, and the listing is flagged for retitle.
What's the difference from the 92005?
In the documented record: none — the 92005's description states its rod count and this one's omits it, which is a difference in descriptions, not in documented hardware. The pair is flagged for reconciliation with Richard.
So which of the two should I buy?
Per the record there is nothing to choose between; the store sells both honestly as one documented reality until Richard says otherwise.
Does it fit an extension pole?
Undocumented — never asserted for a Richard frame in this store. Documented pole work → Hyde 47400/47401/47402.
